Reflections On Pfizer And The Pandemic
A collection of high quality links, relevant to the whole mess, the Pfizer product specifically and why you might like to reflect before buying. With minimal commentary and select quotes.
Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.
Richard P. Feynman, Nobel Laureate
A man pretending to shed a tear of joy and relief on the day of the first injections of the Pfizer product. Two questions:
1) Why is he lying? And, 2) What kind of 'journalism' would present this performance at face value and report it as fact?
COUNTERING THE NARRATIVE
Two in depth articles by Simon Elmer. The first is a summary of the situation up to now, the second a deep dive into the actual numbers.
Prof Joseph Audie counters the narrative, rejecting the hysteria we are now so familiar with, stating:
"SARS-CoV-2 poses a significant risk to a well-defined, vulnerable population of elderly and infirmed people and is a statistical non-issue for the vast majority of people. This is good news, for it empowers communities to adopt targeted and scientifically-based mitigation strategies, ultimately allowing everyone else to keep working to support their families, communities and the health care system, voluntarily practice standard cold and flu mitigation strategies, and ultimately acquire natural immunity, bring the epidemic to an end, preserve and perpetuate their way of life, and avoid the collateral damage wrought by imposition of the many crude and draconian interventions subsumed under the general term “lockdown”. The above analysis and policy recommendation... follows logically from an accurate pIFR-based understanding of the “flu-like” lethality of SARS-CoV-2 and a simple relative risk analysis; it reflects common sense, universal practice, official pandemic mitigation planning, and the opinions of many experts; it has been demonstrated to work during the previous pandemics of 1957, 1968 and 2009; and perhaps most importantly, it has been shown to work in present day non-lockdown countries and free US states - such as Sweden, Japan, Belarus, Tanzania, Nicaragua, South Korea, and Taiwan, and North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Arkansas, Wyoming, and Iowa."
PCR 'TEST' - FRAUD OR FOOLISHNESS
This extensive review of the PCR test currently in use, as referred to in the first article above, identifies ‘10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level' with the test. It's quite technical. The HUGE problems with the PCR test are important because the proposition that there is an unprecedented pandemic underway rests solely on the PCR test results, as outlined above. Without the inflated numbers provided by this test, case numbers and reported death rates would not be large enough to sustain the global panic state of the past year.
This unbelievable but true New York Times article from 2007 clearly demonstrates that the PCR test is not intended for and is not fit for the purpose it is being used for. In fact, such misuse is highly dangerous, irresponsible and eminently capable of generating a faux pandemic. Any policy based on numbers of 'cases' or deaths derived from its use amounts to outrageous stupidity or fraud. This ridiculous sounding story is a microcosm of what is happening now on a global scale.
To make it absolutely clear: as the PCR's inventor, Nobel Laureate Kerry Mulis put it: 'With PCR... you can find almost anything in anybody' - it wasn't designed as a diagnostic 'test' at all.
Essentially, with the 'test' being used as it is - if you look for COVID, you will find it.
CRIME & CORRUPTION
As described in the first article above, Pfizer is a criminal enterprise. The fines they have paid to date approach a total of 5 billion dollars. Their crimes include multiple instances of environmental pollution, uninformed testing on children, bribery, false medical claims and misrepresentation, safety violations, antitrust violations, human and worker's rights violations and, most pertinently, suppressing adverse trial events.
Here is their rap sheet: https://www.corp-research.org/pfizer Given the overwhelming evidence that Pfizer consistently disregards human health and the environment, why would anyone place any trust in them? The controlling shares of Pfizer are owned by BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street - a combination that also controls pretty much everything else you can think of, including the rest of global healthcare and 'big pharma', the banks, the military-industrial complex, oil, and the 6 media conglomerates that dominate the global narrative - and all of big tech which surveils and seems intent on controlling the flow of communication and opinion on the internet.
The British Medical Journal : Conflicts of interest among the UK government’s covid-19 advisers "Corporate interests are always granted access to government decision makers. It’s never a secret from the companies. The secrecy is selective. Secrecy becomes the way to selectively make information available to the powerful, and connected corporations, while the public is kept in the dark.” SAGE, referred to in this piece, and above, is the brilliantly chosen acronym for the body that advised the government last year that, 'a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened', and that, 'the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging.' Such language and intent do not belong in the realm of public health policy. But it can certainly drive opinion and behaviour. Imagine if Pfizer were offered the opportunity to terrify customers towards their product in this way. Given what we know about their moral standing, do you think they would hesitate?
Here, the Union of Concerned Scientists discusses the corruption of science more generally. In the context of the informed opinions offered above, I believe it wise to ask questions about the intricate web of relationships between the prime institutions and individuals involved in driving the narrative over the past year, including The Wuhan Institute of Virology, Anthony Fauci, The Gates' Foundation, Imperial College, Niel Ferguson, the 'world health organisation' and many, many more. At one time, perhaps, courageous journalists would have asked such questions, and uncompromised editors would have supported them. In 2021 that sounds like a fairytale.
There are 70 million psychopaths in the world, at a conservative estimate. A conspiracy theorist is someone who wonders what these people are up to. History abounds with examples of psychopaths conspiring to manipulate, corrupt, subjugate, enslave, rip off and/ or destroy the gullible and the weak. It would be odd if they weren't doing so now.
Evidence of corruption and conspiracy is rife. What is it that conspiracy deniers don't believe? They seem to imagine that beyond a certain scale, corruption whithers away leaving those at the highest levels of global finance and politics as pristine parental figures, who have everything in hand and would never scheme against the interests of the little people.
The time for such fantasies is long gone. There's only one time to battle crime and injustice, and it isn't later.
Don't pay attention to authorities. Think for yourself.
Richard P. Feynman
What is it Pfizer's product meant to do? The following articles suggest that it is intended primarily to make money. As far as I can tell, the 'vaccine', does not offer immunity; does not prevent death or hospitalisation; does not prevent you from getting COVID; does not prevent you from passing it on; does not eliminate the alleged need for travel bans, business closures, lockdowns, social distancing, masking or obsessive 'hygiene' measures, and can be relatively easily updated to be sold to you again for the next variant, next and every week, indefinitely. The companies themselves have even referred to these novel products as 'operating systems' or 'software'. These are not vaccines. They are experimental gene therapy. And there's really no need for them. You are not at any greater risk than you have been in previous epidemics, when you were walking around and taking part in society normally, back before global civilisation was demolished.
"None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus."
(In order to mitigate risk, you see).
Hazards of the COVID-19 vaccine by Prof Romeo F Quijano
This in-depth piece talks specifically about the dangers associated with the novel 'gene therapy' technology being used in the Phizer and Moderna products. According to the US Food and Drug Administration: '[There is]…currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine in sub-populations such as... immunocompromised individuals…..[the] risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time [pathogenic priming]... remains unknown. Additional adverse reactions, some of which may be serious, may become apparent with more widespread use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.'
"If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.” - Mike Yeadon, PhD in pharmacology, who has spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, and is a former vice president at Pfizer.
India’s expert panel on Covid-19 drugs and vaccines has turned down Pfizer's application for emergency use authorisation for its vaccine candidate The committee noted that incidents of palsy, anaphylaxis, and other serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported during post marketing, and the causality of the events with the vaccine is being investigated. Further, the firm has not proposed any plan to generate safety and immunogenicity data in the Indian population. Classy. But, hold on, are they doing that anywhere else?! This is Pfizer we're talking about after all.
Meanwhile, covid infection is shown to provide as much immunity as vaccines, and Merck agree, abandoning efforts to create a vaccine.
The Pfizer product went to market with 3.5 months study of adverse events in trial participants. Beyond that is unknown, and there will be no placebo group for comparison, as all participants will now be offered the vaccine. So the trial has essentially ended after 3.5 months.
"COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated...
This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials...
The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE [antibody-dependent enhancement] should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent."
Many healthy people are dying shortly after receiving the Pfizer product or the second shot.
These are COVID attributed deaths in Gibraltar. Can you guess when the ‘vaccinations’ began?
'45-Year-Old Italian Doctor “In the Prime of Life and in Perfect Health” Drops Dead After the Pfizer mRNA COVID Shot', is a typical headline. Here is another:
The article describes 33 deaths in two UK care homes attributed to COVID (which shouldn't be difficult with a PCR test running at 40+ cycles - see above), but manages to talk around the subject of whether these people had been 'vaccinated' or not. This detail would seem both easy to determine and central to the news story. Without the article stating either way, we still get this reassurance: "A spokesperson for the MHRA emphasised that there was no suggestion the deaths were linked to the vaccine." NO suggestion whatsoever. How could that be?
Deaths in care homes by the dozens shortly after being injected with this experimental new technology should be extremely closely monitored - whether attributed to COVID or no. But it looks like they're not being. They've just told us - there is NO suggestion of a link. No hint of a possibility. Case closed. The rep continues, 'We are saddened to hear about any deaths which have occurred since receiving Covid-19 vaccination. However, our surveillance does not suggest that the Covid-19 vaccines have contributed to any deaths... It is not unexpected that some of these people may naturally fall ill due to their age or underlying conditions shortly after being vaccinated, without the vaccine playing any role in that.' This is the standard line across all such stories. So a third of this care home have just suddenly keeled over, and I'm going to guess (because I have to, and based on the blandishments of the MHRA rep) that they have all just (coincidentally) been 'vaccinated'. As Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has recently said on this subject; “Coincidence is turning out to be quite lethal to some COVID vaccine recipients. If the clinical trials are good predictors, the rate of coincidence is likely to increase dramatically after the second shot.” (Clinical trials suggest that the vast majority of injuries are associated with the second dose).
The article goes on to describe a very troubling nationwide jump in what it calls 'coronavirus' deaths since the introduction of the vaccine. But again, it doesn't make any connection: 'Care home coronavirus deaths nearly tripled in a fortnight... as the disease makes a deadly resurgence in the sector. The UK's national statistics body found 1,705 care home residents died from the virus in the week ending January 22, up from 661 a fortnight ago.' So. that's correlating roughly with the week following their second jab, perhaps? This 'journalist' didn't think to ask.
The red line shows the introduction of the 'vaccine' in the UK.
In the US they are administering the Pfizer and the Moderna 'vaccines'. Both utilise similar genetic manipulation technology. The data in the above graph is from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (US and UK tax payers have quietly paid billions in compensation to the vaccine injured over the years, while manufacturers are indemnified. Pfizer’s UK boss refuses to explain why, here ). The only thing that's changed since this graph was made 2 weeks ago is that the numbers of deaths attributed to the COVID 'vaccine' has almost doubled now. As you can see, the highest reported annual deaths from ALL vaccines combined within the last 5 years was 18. COVID 'vaccine' deaths are now over 500 and rising, within 2 months of introducing the 'vaccine'. So it's already broken all records easily, at around 28 times more deaths than ALL other vaccine deaths combined. The vast majority of these deaths are in the over 65s. Then there are close to 11,000 (reported) vaccine injuries including 690 reports of anaphylactic reactions - most of these due to the Pfizer product - and most adverse reactions due to the second shot. Other vaccine injury reports updated this week on VAERS include 139 cases of facial asymmetry, or Bell’s palsy type symptoms, and 13 miscarriages. Meanwhile the WHO has announced it's fine for pregnant women to take the 'vaccines' - based on what exactly, no one knows. Certainly not trials. Here is a huge collection of anecdotal evidence of injuries from social media.
There are two things to bear in mind in relation to these figures. One is that a great many deaths are almost certainly being misattributed to COVID, so they are not reported as vaccine deaths at all. I think I can state that with some confidence, given the evidence above that the PCR test is completely unfit for purpose. So we can assume that a great many vaccine deaths are being passed off as COVID. The other massive issue is that the VAER system itself is broken, and has been described as little more than 'window dressing' for the vaccine industry. As sobering as the VAERS database numbers are, according to this U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study, which states that 'adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common but underreported', the actual number of adverse events could be up to 100 times higher (Seriously - check the report). If this were accurate we would be looking at over 50000 US 'vaccine' deaths so far from this miracle cure, and up to 1,100,000 injuries. And that doesn't even include deaths misattributed as COVID. Of course these numbers are speculative, but they are based on the official sources I have provided here. None of this is to suggest that the Pfizer product would kill you. That's relatively unlikely. But it is killing people. Quite a few, undeniably. So, what does that say about its value as a health measure? Does death seem healthy? Is it possible that the thing about it that is killing and maiming people might also be a thing that makes it just generally not good for a person's health? That seems like a reasonable question. Some might say a no-brainer. This vaccine might compromise what good health you have, permanently - and for what reason?
Injuries they know are happening right now.
A discussion of pathogenic priming - the reason mRNA and other 'vaccines' for coronaviruses have always failed (disastrously) before.
An in depth study of pathogenic priming, which could potentially be the cause of all these deaths and other adverse reactions. "Failure of SARS and MERS vaccines in animal trials involved pathogenesis consistent with an immunological priming that could involve autoimmunity in lung tissues due to previous exposure to the SARS and MERS spike protein. Exposure pathogenesis to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 likely will lead to similar outcomes... SARS-CoV-2 has some unexplained pathogenic features that might be related to the table of putative pathogenic priming peptides. Exposure to these specific peptides - via either infection or vaccination - might prime patients for increased risk of enhanced pathogenicity during future exposure due either to future pandemic or outbreaks or via universal vaccination programs."
Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trigger rare allergic reactions This one addresses the nanoparticles in the Pfizer product and the associated risks.
VIDEO & PODCAST LINKS
SARS-CoV2 and the Rise of Medical Technocracy. Lee Merritt, M.D. *This is no longer on youtube as it apparently violated their guidelines. Youtube never provide any explanation of which part breached which guideline, content just disappears. I can’t find it uploaded anywhere else, although I do have the audio if you’re really keen. There is no shortage of highly experienced and qualified professionals contesting the narrative as in this video.
I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.
Richard P. Fenyman